Compliance
IEEE 519 harmonic limits explained
The tables most specifications cite, what each column actually constrains, and the three places projects usually get the calculation wrong.
IEEE 519-2014 limits harmonic voltage distortion at the point of common coupling to 8% THD on systems at or below 1 kV, and harmonic current distortion according to the ratio of short-circuit current to load current, expressed as TDD.
Voltage limits apply to the utility, which controls the supply. Current limits apply to the customer, who controls the loads. The standard separates the two because responsibility is divided at the metering point.
Voltage limits at the point of common coupling
These are the numbers a utility or consultant will quote when they say the supply is out of specification. The limit tightens as system voltage rises, because high-voltage networks serve more customers and a given distortion level affects more equipment.
| Bus voltage at PCC | Individual harmonic (%) | Total THD (%) |
|---|---|---|
| V ≤ 1.0 kV | 5.0 | 8.0 |
| 1 kV < V ≤ 69 kV | 3.0 | 5.0 |
| 69 kV < V ≤ 161 kV | 1.5 | 2.5 |
| V > 161 kV | 1.0 | 1.5 |
Two conditions sit alongside the table and are easy to miss. The limits apply to the worst weekly condition, not the average, and they are evaluated at the PCC rather than inside the installation. A plant can be fully compliant at its own main board while contributing to a PCC violation shared with neighbouring customers.
Current limits, by short-circuit ratio
Current limits are not a single number because the same harmonic current causes different voltage distortion depending on how stiff the supply is. A 100 A harmonic current on a 2 MVA transformer barely moves the voltage; the same current on a 200 kVA transformer produces severe distortion.
IEEE 519 handles this with the short-circuit ratio, Isc/IL, where Isc is the available short-circuit current at the PCC and IL is the maximum demand load current.
| Isc/IL | h < 11 | 11 ≤ h < 17 | 17 ≤ h < 23 | 23 ≤ h < 35 | 35 ≤ h | TDD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| < 20 | 4.0 | 2.0 | 1.5 | 0.6 | 0.3 | 5.0 |
| 20 < 50 | 7.0 | 3.5 | 2.5 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 8.0 |
| 50 < 100 | 10.0 | 4.5 | 4.0 | 1.5 | 0.7 | 12.0 |
| 100 < 1000 | 12.0 | 5.5 | 5.0 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 15.0 |
| > 1000 | 15.0 | 7.0 | 6.0 | 2.5 | 1.4 | 20.0 |
Even harmonics are limited to 25% of the odd harmonic limits shown. That is not a formality: DC offset in a rectifier, or a half-wave asymmetry, produces even orders that the odd-harmonic columns do not constrain.
Getting the short-circuit ratio right
This single number decides which row of the table applies, and it is where most compliance calculations go wrong. Two errors dominate.
Using transformer kVA instead of fault level
Isc is the fault current available at the PCC, not the transformer rating. For a transformer of rating S and impedance Z%, the approximate fault level is S ÷ (Z/100). A 1000 kVA transformer at 6% impedance gives roughly 16.7 kA at the LV terminals.
Isc = S / (√3 × VLL × (Z/100))
# 1000 kVA, 400 V, 6% impedance
Isc = 1000 000 / (1.732 × 400 × 0.06) ≈ 24 000 A
# ratio against a 1200 A load current
Isc/IL ≈ 20 → boundary of the first two rows
Using measured current instead of maximum demand
IL is the maximum demand load current, taken as the average of the twelve highest monthly demand readings over the preceding year — not the current flowing when the analyser happened to be connected. Using a light-load reading inflates the ratio and moves the installation into a more permissive row.
The PCC question decides who pays
If a compliance study places the PCC at the utility metering point, then every harmonic source in the plant contributes to the same limit, and a single large drive can push the whole installation out of compliance. If the PCC is taken at the customer's main breaker, the calculation is narrower.
In practice the difference determines whether the fix is one filter at the main board or several smaller filters distributed around the plant. Distributed filtration usually costs more in hardware but less in cable and installation, and it avoids the resonance risk of concentrating compensation at one point.
When the specification is not IEEE 519
| Standard | Region | How it differs |
|---|---|---|
| EN 61000-2-2 / 2-4 | Europe | Sets compatibility levels rather than emission limits; the emission limits sit in EN 61000-3-2 and 3-12 for equipment. |
| EREC G5/5 | United Kingdom | Assessment based on the number and type of harmonic sources, with staged limits above 5th harmonic. |
| GB/T 14549 | China | Voltage THD limit of 5% at 0.38 kV, 4% at 6–10 kV. Tighter than IEEE at low voltage. |
| IEC 61000-4-7 | International | Measurement method, not a limit. Defines how harmonics are grouped and aggregated. |
If a tender document cites one of these instead, the row you need will differ, and the filter rating derived from an IEEE 519 table will be wrong in either direction. Confirm which standard the acceptance test will use before sizing anything.
Need a compliance calculation for a tender?
Send the transformer rating and impedance, the maximum demand, and the harmonic spectrum. We will return the applicable row, the TDD margin, and the filter rating required to stay inside it.